Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday began delivering judgment in the long-running terrorism trial of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader Nnamdi Kanu, in the defendant’s absence.
The judge ordered proceedings to continue without Kanu, describing his behaviour in court as unruly. The decision came after the dismissal of three fresh motions filed by Kanu, which the court deemed unmeritorious.
During the session, Kanu had interjected, insisting the court could not proceed as he had not filed his final written address. He raised his voice, demanding, “Which law states that you can charge me on an unwritten law? Show me. Omotosho, where is the law? Any judgment declared in this Court is a complete rubbish.” He also accused Justice Omotosho of bias and claimed the judge lacked understanding of the law.
After a brief recess, the prosecution, led by Adegboyega Awomolo, urged the court to continue the trial without Kanu, citing his disruptive conduct.
Justice Omotosho stated that while a defendant has a constitutional right to be present during trial, repeated misconduct can allow proceedings to continue in their absence. “If a defendant misconducts himself or acts in an unruly manner during the course of his trial, his trial can be conducted in his absence,” he said, adding that the Court of Justice is a temple of God.
The judge noted that Kanu’s unruly behaviour was not new, citing several previous instances, and emphasized that he had indicated he would not present a defence. Thursday’s session was therefore scheduled for judgment and possible sentencing.
Following the order, Kanu was removed from the courtroom, and Justice Omotosho proceeded with delivering the ruling.
